Router

The day has come when my £25pm Toob Fibre 900/900Mbps, via CityFibre infrastructure, was finally installed.

After all the wiring was done, the new Toob router was connected, and I started testing.

To my surprise, Toob switched to a different Linksys Velop model than I initially expected. I have been supplied with Linksys SPNMX56 (SPNMX56TB to be exact), which, by default, comes with a 2.5 Gbps WAN port.

From my previous post, where I chose £40 Linksys MX4200 as my next router, I did an analysis of my needs, and I concluded that I am fine with a 1Gbps WAN port. Toob’s approach to go with 2.5Gbit is more future-proof thinking. If they want to offer higher plans, they will not need to replace hardware. For my needs and 900Mbps connection, the 1Gbps (1000Mbps) port is more value for money.

In my previous post, In search of the perfect OpenWrt router, I discussed my potential future router. When I started researching it more thoroughly, I paused purchasing the Brume 2 and tried to think of what would be better.

I looked into the Brume 2 when I began researching a potential change of broadband provider from Virgin Media to a full (synchronous) fibre connection (CityFibre).

With the provider (reseller) that I am currently considering (Toob), a 900/900Mbps connection offered the best value for money (£25 per month with no price increases over the whole contract period). However, to achieve that speed, they need to provide me with the right hardware.

I’ve noticed that most resellers of CityFibre services utilise Linksys devices, particularly the MX4200 in its second version (v2). This model is sometimes branded as the Linksys Velop MX4200 (AX4200) or ISP-branded as the Linksys SPNMX42, which is simply a v2 in disguise. However, Linksys has already discontinued this device.

A router with custom firmware (OpenWrt) is a basic device on my home network, but I am also using it in the business environment as a main device, and all works great.

In the past I used DD-WRT on my routers. Despite that their project is still ongoing, I found it lacking behind current needs.

OpenWrt use strictly depends on the device – router, that I am using. I always choose a device that will work for me and it will not bend under spikes of load.